Why Finishing The Mix Feels So Hard — SonicScoop

This is a guest post by mastering engineer Alexander Wright, author of The Wright Balance Method: A Philosophy of Mastering, Listening, and Letting Go.

At a certain point in every creative project, it feels as if you’re no longer the one driving. The art has taken the wheel.

When a production reaches this stage, your role—whatever it may have been when the work began—shifts. You go from actively shaping to carefully guiding. You’re now listening more than directing, and tending rather than imposing.

That’s exactly how the final stage of mastering feels to me. The song begins to tell me where it needs to go, and my job becomes helping it cross the finish line faithfully.

After mastering over 1,600 releases across genres, and refining my approach as a student at Berklee College of Music, I’ve learned that finishing a piece of music is as much an emotional journey as a technical one. It’s often the hardest step to take.

The final step in creation—whether it’s bouncing the final mix, signing a painting, or delivering a design—carries a unique emotional weight. It’s the moment where the project passes out of its creator’s hands and into the world.

With that handoff comes a rush of vulnerability and conflicting feelings.

Why is declaring something “done” so difficult?

Why do so many creatives feel anxious, exposed, or reluctant at the finish line?

What is it about the psychology behind that last mile of the creative process that makes “done” is such a loaded word?

The Emotional Weight of “Done”

Finishing and sharing a creative work isn’t just an administrative step, it’s an emotional event.

By the time a song reaches mastering—that the final stage of polishing before release)—it might have been living with the artist for months, or even years.

I often receive mix files with half-joking names like “Final Mix v10—Really super final this time.” It’s a familiar joke in music and design circles: “final” versions seem endless. But beneath the humor lies the perennial truth that the final version is hard to commit to.

One reason for this is that committing to our final version requires vulnerability.

Finalizing a work means saying, “This is it. his represents me.”

It’s the point where you cease tinkering and face the prospect of sharing your creation with others. That can feel like baring your soul: every lyric, every mix decision now open for judgment.

In visual design, hitting “send” on the final logo file can carry the same weight, knowing a piece of your creative thought is about to stand on its own. In fine art, painters often struggle to know when a painting is finished. Some, like Joan Miró, even quipped that “a work is finished when there is nothing left that annoys me.”

Even that tongue-in-cheek rule hints at how personal the criteria can be. We invest so much of ourselves into our art that finishing it feels like a very personal milestone, and that’s an inherently emotional experience.

I’ve seen artists delay the final step out of fear. Fear that it isn’t perfect, or that it won’t be received well. Fear of no longer having this work-in-progress as a safe place to hide. When you’re still working on a project, it’s alive and full of potential. Once it’s finished, it becomes something definite that can succeed or fail.

That prospect can be daunting. It’s no wonder the last 5% often takes 50% of the effort—emotionally, if not technically.

The Perfectionism Trap

Perfectionism is perhaps the most common culprit behind creative work that never seems to conclude.

There’s always another tweak to make, another detail to polish. A vocal take could be a little smoother, the colors in an illustration a bit more balanced. We chase an idealized vision that often only grows more elusive the closer we get to “done.”

As the adage sometimes attributed to Leonardo da Vinci goes, “Art is never finished, only abandoned.” Every creative understands this sentiment to at least some degree.

I’ve had mixing engineers send me “final” mixes, only to call back frantically a day later with a revised version because they caught “one more thing”.

I’ve been that person myself—listening to my own recording at 3 AM, hearing the smallest of flaws and reopening the session to fix it. In moderation, this drive can improve the work. But perfectionism can also become paralyzing. We start equating the quality of the art with our own self-worth, and suddenly the stakes of imperfection feel incredibly high.

One principle I’ve learned in my career, and that I try to impart to the artists I work with, is that perfect is not the point.

Art isn’t a math problem with one correct answer. It’s a captured moment: a feeling translated into sound, image, or words.

Often, the charm of a recording or painting lies in its idiosyncrasies—the raw edge, the spontaneous brush stroke, the human quiver in a voice. Those “flaws” are sometimes the very things that make it compelling.

A master-ready mix, for example, doesn’t have to be flawless. It has to be intentional. The goal isn’t to eliminate every imperfection, but to ensure the soul of the work comes through intact.

That means at some point, you have to stop nitpicking technical details and ask: Does it feel honest? If it does, then continuing to polish might start diminishing the art’s shine instead of enhancing it.

Over-focusing on perfection can even strip away the emotion that made the piece special.

In audio, I’ve heard mixes that were edited and re-edited to death; the life was drained out in the quest for a sterile ideal. Similarly, a design that goes through fifty revisions can end up feeling generic, losing the spark of the earlier drafts. We need to recognize when further changes stop adding value and instead start reflecting our own anxiety.

This is where a bit of wisdom from the mastering world helps: when in doubt, do no harm. My mentor Jonathan Wyner—a mastering legend—taught me that sometimes the most important tool is simply your confidence to say “it’s enough.” Every tweak should serve the art, not the creator’s ego.

When Art Becomes Identity

Creative work is deeply personal. By the time you’ve reached the final stages, it’s likely that the project has become intertwined with your identity. The song isn’t just a song—it’s your song, a piece of your story. That painting contains your vision; that design pitch carries your reputation. It’s natural then, that letting go feels like handing over a part of yourself.

I’ve encountered this often with artists right before mastering. They express that they’re “terrified” or “excited and scared” to hear the mastered files, because the process symbolizes the end of a chapter.

One artist told me it felt like sending their kid off to college—a mix of pride, protectiveness, and a sense of loss.

We can laugh, but there’s truth in the analogy. You nurture a piece of art from inception, pour countless hours and emotions into it, and when it’s finished, it goes off into the wider world where you can’t control what happens to it. Will people “get” it? Will they love it as much as you do? Or will it be misunderstood, criticized, or—perhaps worse—ignored?

This attachment can lead to over-identification with the work. If the project succeeds, you feel validated; if it flops, you might feel personally defeated.

That’s a heavy load for any piece of art to carry, and it’s a big reason artists resist declaring something finished—because once it’s out there, their own sense of self might feel on the line.

The challenge is to care deeply about your art, but not become your art. Our creations often reflect who we are, but they are not the entirety of us.

I remind younger engineers and artists (and myself, when needed) that a song’s reception doesn’t rewrite your personal worth or talent. Each project is a snapshot of a moment in time, not a final judgement on your creativity.

Paradoxically, maintaining a bit of healthy distance from your work can make it easier to finish it. When you see the song or painting as the audience’s to experience next, rather than your personal testament, it liberates you to let it be what it is, warts and all.

After the Release: Letting Go and Moving Forward

So, you’ve mustered the courage to call the project finished. You print the master, export the final render, or frame the artwork. What comes next?

Creators often speak of a strange void after a big release—a mix of relief, pride, and even sadness. After all, something that occupied your heart and mind for so long is now essentially done. I’ve observed artists go through a subtle grieving process in the days or weeks after releasing an album. There’s the thrill of sharing it with the world, but also the realization that a chapter has closed.

This is where the idea of post-release detachment comes in.

It’s an emotional recalibration. You have to learn to let the work live its own life.

As a mastering engineer, I sometimes find myself acting as a kind of emotional guide as well as a sonic technician. A huge part of my job is fostering trust so that artists know that it’s okay to step back and leave their work in my hands.

In one memorable case, a client had spent five years on an album. When I finally mastered it and sent it off, she said she felt “emptied out,” unsure who she was without this project to chip away at.

We talked about how that emptiness is natural. It’s the echo of having given so much of yourself to something. From that conversation I learnt that the key is to see the letting go not as a loss, but as making room for the next creative chapter.

I often encourage artists to take a moment and acknowledge the accomplishment — not just the external achievements (streams, sales, reviews) but the personal victory of completing the work. In short, it’s important to celebrate closure. Remember why you started it in the first place, and recognize that releasing it is the ultimate act of trust. You’re trusting the audience with a piece of your experience, and trusting yourself that you’ve done your best.

From my perspective, having a philosophy or framework helps in these moments. In my case, I developed what I call The Wright Balance Method—a personal philosophy of mastering that revolves around balancing technical precision with emotional intuition and, importantly, knowing when to let go.

It’s something I formulated over many hundreds of projects to guide myself when that perfectionistic voice in my head gets too loud. One of its core ideas is that mastering isn’t about squeezing out every last drop of loudness or clarity, but about preserving the emotional truth of the music and then stepping aside.

In practice, that often means doing less, not more—having the confidence to say “this song has arrived.” That mindset has been invaluable not only in my mastering work, but in my own creative pursuits outside of audio.

Whether you’re a musician, designer, or painter, developing your own version of this balance is crucial. Technical skills and hard work get you far, but the final act of creation requires a gentle surrender. It’s about recognizing when further effort yields diminishing returns and when it’s time to release your grip.

Finishing something takes nerve. You need the courage to move forward and the respect to leave the work untouched, just as it is.

Conclusion

In the world of mastering, there’s a saying I come back to again and again: If it sounds right, it is right.

The longer I work, the more I believe this applies to the creative process at large, especially the final stages of it. All that tangled emotion at the end—the angst, the hope, the fear and relief—reminds me that making art means letting go just as much as it means bringing something to life.

As someone who has spent thousands of hours on that fragile threshold between “work-in-progress” and “done,” I’ve come to see finalization not as a last hurdle but as a meaningful ritual. It’s a rite of passage for the art and the artist alike.

Finishing a project is a quiet thank you: to the work for what it gave, and to ourselves for staying with it.

Endings don’t just close things off, they send us back to work with whatever we’ve learned along the way. In mastering, my role is often to provide that final gentle push and say “It’s ready.”

In life as in art, sometimes we all need that reassurance. So if you find yourself holding back on that last step, take a breath, listen deeply one more time, and when it feels like you—let it go. Letting go isn’t just about finishing. It’s about giving your future self the freedom to begin again.

Alexander Wright is a mastering engineer based in Seattle. He has worked on over 1,600 releases and is the author of The Wright Balance Method: A Philosophy of Mastering, Listening, and Letting Go. Learn more at alexanderwright.com.

Please note: When you buy products through links on this page, we may earn an affiliate commission.