Pokémon Scarlet and Violet is school-themed in virtually each means, together with the Pokémon League problem. Besides there’s one curveball when you acquire all of the badges: You need to cross a job interview. I handed by answering conservatively, however tons of different gamers are failing the check for probably the most bullshit cause conceivable: They answered actually.
When you’ve overwhelmed eight gymnasium leaders and obtained their badges, you’ll be allowed to problem the Pokémon League. It’s all very normal stuff all the way in which from the start of the sequence. Typically they’ll toss you a couple of curveballs, like letting you problem the Elite 4 in any order in Solar and Moon. Otherwise you’ll meet a couple of extra opponents in Sword and Defend. However in Scarlet and Violet, it’s important to reply some interview questions earlier than you possibly can battle. Sounds easy, proper? Improper.
Gamers report that they may fail the Pokémon League check by telling Elite 4 member Rika that they had been taking the problem for enjoyable. Having enjoyable battling Pokémon? How dare you. Clearly, you don’t deserve these shiny gymnasium badges. There are such a lot of trainers on the market who want they may very well be in your place, and also you dare to take battling frivolously? This example can be humorous if answering “incorrectly” didn’t stop you from taking the League problem.
One player in contrast the interview to the stress of real-life job interviews. One other pointed out that the sport was incentivizing gamers to lie about their motivations. I believe the larger difficulty is that video games with a number of responses typically don’t penalize you for selecting between a number of legitimate solutions. You would be pondering that “Only for enjoyable, I suppose…” was a wonderfully legitimate reply, solely to be instructed NO FUN ALLOWED. Personally, I believe Rika shouldn’t have monetized her pursuits.
G/O Media might get a fee
I do know higher than that. In contrast to Rika, I’m a enjoyable individual. I might by no means combine my private pursuits with one thing that I do for a residing… ha… ha.
