A battery champ midranger
The Google Pixel 9a represents a departure from Google’s typical Pixel design language, with no camera bar and an almost flush bump. This tweak allows the Pixel 9a to sport a 5,100mAh battery capacity for over 100 hours of battery life with Extreme Battery Saver enabled. Throw in a Tensor G4 processor and a new camera system, and the Pixel 9a looks like it could be a hit.
For
- Tensor G4 processor for faster performance and AI smarts
- New dual camera system with 48MP wide camera and 13MP ultrawide camera
- 5,100mAh battery capacity and Qi wireless charging support
- 7 years of full OS upgrades and feature drops
Against
- No Qi2 charging support
- Camera bump isn’t quite flush — but it’s close
- Smaller camera sensor than Pixel 8a
The latest budget iPhone
Apple’s next midrange iPhone is here, and the iPhone 16e sits in a weird place. It’s more expensive and feature-rich than the iPhone SE it replaces, but lacks critical features like MagSafe collectivity and a dual-camera system. As such, buyers might want to look to the Google Pixel 9a instead.
For
- Apple A18 chip with Apple Intelligence support
- USB-C port for charging
- Modernized design with a glass back
- 6.1-inch OLED display
Against
- No MagSafe or Qi2 support
- Single-camera system
- 60Hz display and notch feels outdated compared to ProMotion and Dynamic Island models
- No Camera Control button
- More expensive
Why do smartphones have odd camera bumps when they could just have a larger battery and a flat back instead? That’s the question that Google seems to answer with the Google Pixel 9a, a midranger with a 5,100mAh battery capacity and a uniform 8.9mm thickness. In some ways, Apple’s latest midrange offering — the iPhone 16e — is the polar opposite of the Pixel 9a. So, how do they compare?
While some will prefer the 6.1-inch compact form factor of the iPhone 16e compared to the 6.3-inch Pixel 9a, that’s where the advantages start and end. It starts at $599, putting it above the sub-$500 midrange Pixel. And despite costing less, the Google Pixel 9a seems to offer a lot more features. Let’s break down the pros and cons of purchasing each just-released smartphone.
Google Pixel 9a vs. iPhone 16e: Design and display
Why you can trust Android Central
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
One thing I’ve always loved about Pixel phones is how identifiable they are, largely thanks to the unique camera bar. It’s been a part of Pixel design language for multiple generations now, but it goes to the wayside with the Google Pixel 9a. Instead, the Pixel 9a has a nearly flat composite plastic back with a slight bump for the camera lenses. The dual-camera system is positioned asymmetrically on the left side of the rear case.
It’s an interesting look, likely designed to maximize internal space. However, it results in the Pixel 9a losing some of its character, and some Pixel fans might not like it. The side rails of the device use a satin metal finish, and there’s a Gorilla Glass 3 covering on the front. The entire phone is protected with an IP68 dust and water-resistance rating.
In terms of size, the Pixel 9a measures 154.7mm x 73.3mm x 8.9mm, which is technically the same thickness as the Pixel 8a. It’s important to remember that unlike the Pixel 8a, the new Pixel 9a is nearly 8.9mm thick at every point due to the lack of a camera bar. It’s on the heavier side, too, weighing 185.9 grams.
Apple’s iPhone 16e is similarly minimalistic, with a rectangular design and curved corners joined by a singular rear camera. While it does have a camera bump, it’s still smaller than the Pixel 9a in every way. The iPhone 16e measures 146.7mm x 71.5mm x 7.80mm and weighs just 167 grams. This will make the iPhone 16e feel notably more compact and lightweight than the Pixel 9a, which will be preferred by some.
The iPhone 16e also arguably features more premium materials, with a glass back and aluminum side rails.
Looking past the large bezels, the Pixel 9a has a few key display advantages. It’s larger, with a 6.3-inch pOLED panel that can switch between 60Hz and 120Hz as needed. It also has a 1080 x 2424 resolution and an impressive 2,700-nit peak brightness rating. All told, with all that and HDR support, the Google Pixel 9a should look great in most situations.
Meanwhile, the iPhone 16e is objectively using dated display technology. It finally uses an OLED display but is still limited to 60Hz refresh rates. The brightness isn’t great either, with a 1,200-nit peak brightness rating. Unlike newer iPhones, the iPhone 16e doesn’t have a Dynamic Island and instead uses a fairly large notch. It looks gargantuan compared to the small hole-punch cutout on the Pixel 9a.
As a whole, the iPhone 16e has the clear advantage of being smaller and lighter than the Pixel 9a. Meanwhile, the Google Pixel 9a seems to use its extra space wisely with a better display than its Apple competitor.
Google Pixel 9a vs. iPhone 16e: Hardware and specs
Both the Google Pixel 9a and iPhone 16e make sacrifices to hit their lower price points, but which is the more complete package?
The two phones are very similar in terms of their processor, with the Pixel 9a using the Tensor G4 chip and the iPhone 16e using the A18 chip. While the Tensor G4 processor is a worse performer than Apple’s top chip, the A18 system-on-a-chip (SoC) in the iPhone 16e is a binned version with one fewer graphics core.
By comparison, the Tensor G4 in the Pixel 9a is the same one found throughout the rest of the Pixel 9 series. The Apple A18 SoC could still perform better in benchmarks, but both devices will be capable of daily use. The Tensor G4 chip helps the Pixel 9a secure the software advantage with tons of Google AI and Gemini features. On top of that, the Pixel 9a gets seven years of full OS upgrades and feature drops.
| Category | Google Pixel 9a | iPhone 16e |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Apple A18 |
| Display | 6.3-inch Actua pOLED display, 1080 x 2424 resolution, 120Hz, 2700 nits peak brightness | 6.1-inch OLED, 2532 x 1170 resolution, 60Hz, 1,200 nits peak brightness |
| Operating System | Android 15 | iOS 18 |
| Memory | 8GB | 8GB |
| Storage | 128GB, 256GB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB |
| Battery | 5,100 mAh | 26 hours of video playback (exact mAh unknown) |
| Charging | 23W wired, Qi wireless charging | 20W wired, Qi wireless charging |
| Rear camera(s) | 48 MP wide camera, 13MP ultrawide camera | 48MP single camera |
| Front camera | 13MP front camera | 12MP front camera |
| Durability | IP68, Gorilla Glass 3 | IP68, Ceramic Shield |
| Colors | Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony | White, Black |
| Weight | 185.9 grams | 167 grams |
| Dimensions | 154.7mm x 73.3mm x 8.9mm | 146.7mm x 71.5mm x 7.80mm |
Both phones are expected to be battery champions, but the Pixel 9a is almost certainly the winner in capacity. It now sports a 5,100mAh battery that can last up to 100 hours with Extreme Battery Saver enabled, according to Google. Apple says the iPhone 16e can go for 26 hours of video playback but doesn’t share the exact capacity. Due to the iPhone 16e using Apple’s first C1 cellular modem, battery life is expected to be better than iPhones with Qualcomm modems.
Neither midranger has excellent charging speeds. Oddly, the iPhone 16e doesn’t even support MagSafe or Qi2, meaning it is limited to slow Qi wireless charging with no magnetic alignment. The Google Pixel 9a similarly doesn’t support Qi2 and tops out at just 23W wired charging speeds.
Google Pixel 9a vs. iPhone 16e: Cameras
Apple markets the iPhone 16e’s singular rear camera as a “do-it-all” sensor that can mimic a main, telephoto, and ultrawide camera. Is that really the case? The 48MP single camera has a f/1.6 aperture and can take 2x zoom photos at optical quality with sensor crop. Anything beyond that, though, and you’re using lossy digital zoom. As such, this camera might leave something to be desired for those who enjoy dedicated ultrawide and telephoto lenses.
On the front, the iPhone 16e provides a 12MP, f/1.9 camera that will be more than capable for all your selfie and video recording needs. It can even shoot 4K video at up to 60FPS, for instance.
Google uses two camera lenses on the Pixel 9a: a 48 MP wide camera and a 13MP ultrawide camera. Like the iPhone 16e, the Pixel 9a doesn’t have a true telephoto camera and instead uses “Super Res Zoom” to enhance the digital zoom quality up to 8x. Beyond that, the smartphone falls back to digital zoom. Unlike the iPhone 16e, the Pixel 9a’s dedicated ultrawide lens will let users take shots with a wider field of view.
The front-facing camera is a 13MP, f/2.2 lens with a 96.1-degree field of view. Notably, the Pixel 9a supports more advanced camera features than ever, including Astrophotography support for the first time.
Google Pixel 9a vs. iPhone 16e: Which one should you buy?
Google’s redesign of the Pixel 9a is somewhat controversial, and not everyone is going to like the new design. Setting that aside for a minute, it’s impressive how many features Google managed to cram into a phone at this price point. At a time when Apple, Samsung, and OnePlus are all selling new midrangers above the $500 threshold, Google is keeping the Pixel A-series phone just under it. That’s an advantage that neither the OnePlus 13R nor the iPhone 16e have.
With that being said, the Pixel 9a is over a millimeter thicker than the iPhone 16e. It’s bigger by every dimension, too. For the person that considers iOS an essential feature and prefers a compact phone, the iPhone 16e could be worth considering.
The best $500 Android phone
At a time when Apple and OnePlus are hiking the prices of their midrange smartphones, Google’s $500 Pixel 9a is like a breath of fresh air. It has excellent battery capacity for its size, plus a Tensor G4 chip for on-device AI and stellar software support.
Not enough to compete
Basically the only reason you’d want to buy the iPhone 16e is if you absolutely need a phone with iOS. Or, if you want a tiny and thin midranger. Otherwise, the new Pixel 9a is cheaper and offers more features.
Source link
